A federal court in Florida ordered two Fundsz operators to pay more than $31 million in restitution and penalties after finding they sold investors on fictitious crypto and metals trading.

Gold bullion bars. Photo: Stevebidmead via Wikimedia Commons (CC0). Source
A federal court in Florida ordered two operators of the Fundsz scheme to pay more than $31 million for fraud involving digital assets and precious metals. The Commodity Futures Trading Commission announced the default judgment on Sept. 30, resolving the last open claims in a case it first filed in 2023.
The order targets Brian Early of Louisiana and Alisha Ann Kingrey of Arkansas. The U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida found that the pair, as board members and social media moderators for the unincorporated Fundsz entity, made material misrepresentations about expected profits, the risk of loss and past trading performance.
Participants were told their money would be traded under a proprietary algorithm and could be withdrawn after 180 days with interest. None of that was true, the court found. When Early and Kingrey learned the CFTC was investigating, they began walking back the profit claims and worked to wipe out the operation's social media presence.
The payment terms are exact. Early and Kingrey must pay $15,732,455 in restitution to victims and a $15,752,455 civil monetary penalty, putting the combined total at about $31.5 million. The court also permanently barred both from trading and from CFTC registration, and enjoined them from further violations of commodity law.
The promises behind the case were extreme. Fundsz told investors a proprietary system trading crypto and precious metals could generate more than 3 percent a week, Cryptopolitan reported, citing the 2023 complaint. Promotional material claimed a $2,500 stake could grow to $1 million within four years. Client funds were never traded as described, and the returns shown to investors were made up.
The case is Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Larralde et al., No. 6:23-cv-1445-WWB-DCI, filed July 31, 2023. The new release tags the original complaint as Press Release No. 8766-23, which opened the Middle District of Florida action that has now run for more than three years. CoinAlert's account of the judgment matches the CFTC figures: $15.73 million in restitution alongside a near-identical penalty, plus permanent trading and registration bars for both defendants.
Two more defendants were dealt with through consent orders. Rene Larralde, identified as Fundsz's founder and controlling person, deceived participants and diverted investor money for personal use, the court found. His estate, represented by Rachel Larralde, must give up a personal residence bought with investor funds along with more than $2.7 million in other assets to the court-appointed receiver.
Juan Pablo Valcarce, the fourth defendant, faces a permanent injunction plus trading and registration bans under his consent order. The CFTC release states the default judgment and the two consent orders resolve every remaining claim in the action.
The judgment lands as crypto fraud losses keep climbing. The FBI logged 181,565 cryptocurrency-related complaints in 2025 with losses above $11 billion, and the FTC recorded more than $7.9 billion in investment-scam losses with a median above $10,000, according to Cryptopolitan's review of the federal data. Chainalysis estimated at least $14 billion lost to crypto scams last year, possibly more than $17 billion once unidentified addresses are counted.
Enforcement has spread beyond Fundsz. The SEC and CFTC separately sued Goliath Ventures and founder Christopher Delgado, with the SEC alleging at least $425 million raised from more than 1,300 investors and the CFTC citing about $397 million from roughly 1,600 customers. An October 2025 Financial Stability Board review found uneven national crypto rules still let fraud operations shop for weaker jurisdictions.
What victims actually receive remains uncertain. The estate assets go to the court-appointed receiver, while the $15.7 million restitution order against Early and Kingrey must still be collected. The agency has cautioned that repayment orders do not guarantee recovery when defendants lack enough assets to cover them.