Loading article...
The CFTC issued two Oct. 9 actions - a proposal defining sports, politics, culture and weather event contracts as swaps, and an immediately effective interim rule keeping sportsbook and casino wagers outside the swap definition.
The US Capitol in Washington at dusk. Photo: Martin Falbisoner via Wikimedia Commons (CC BY-SA 3.0). Source
The Commodity Futures Trading Commission took two matching actions on Oct. 9 to draw the federal line between prediction markets and gambling. One proposal would expressly define event contracts as swaps. The other, an interim final rule, codifies that casino-style wagers are not.
The proposed rulemaking would define swap to include event contracts based on sports, politics, cultural and weather-related events, from the Commission's Oct. 9 proposal covering sports-to-weather contracts. The proposal says the contracts are financial instruments commonly known to the trade as swaps and aims to resolve any ambiguity. Comments go through Regulations.gov within 30 days of Federal Register publication, so Oct. 9 sets neither the deadline nor the effective date.
"Americans use event contracts to hedge risks, speculate, and provide the public with information about the outcome of future events," Chairman Michael S. Selig said, in remarks Decrypt carried from the Oct. 9 announcement. "These products are commodity derivatives squarely within the CFTC's regulatory remit under the Commodity Exchange Act and are within the agency's exclusive jurisdiction."
The interim rule moves the other way for traditional gambling. It locks in the agency's longstanding position that wagers placed on sportsbooks and casino games fall outside the swap definition, takes effect immediately upon Federal Register publication, and carries its own 30-day comment window, as detailed Oct. 10. "Casino-style gambling products are not derivatives," Selig said in the same announcement, according to the same account.
The two actions formalize proposals the agency sent to the White House for review late last month. The interim rule becomes immediate policy while staying open to public input during implementation, according to Oct. 9 coverage.
The backdrop is a multi-front court fight. Several states are suing prediction-market operators as illegal gambling operations, and the CFTC has countersued. Court decisions have split: one federal appellate decision opposed the states and two supported them, per the Oct. 9 breakdown. The Sept. 25 Sixth Circuit ruling involving Kalshi held the company had not shown its sports-event contracts met the statutory swap definition and added that even assuming they were swaps, the Commodity Exchange Act did not preempt Ohio or Tennessee gambling law, as analyzed Oct. 10.
Policy analysts read the interim rule as litigation positioning. "We view this interim final rule as designed to improve the agency's position in court as the states are arguing that the CFTC's definition of a swap would make federally illegal any wager made at a state or tribal casino or sportsbook," TD Cowen analyst Jaret Seiberg wrote in a Friday note cited in coverage. "Whether this actually works is a different question."
Critics spoke the same day. Better Markets securities-policy director Benjamin Schiffrin argued sports event contracts enable sports betting and should stay under state gambling law, as reported Oct. 9. If the swap reading holds, Selig's exclusivity claim would put Kalshi and Polymarket beyond state gambling regulators, per the Oct. 10 report.
Event contracts typically let traders buy yes-or-no positions on a future outcome with a fixed payout, usually $1, with value set by the outcome and positions usable to hedge risk or speculate, one explainer noted, citing the Commission's LearnandProtect materials, in the same analysis. The agency recently issued no-action relief letting crypto apps offer regulated derivatives and sent separate crypto-market rulemakings forward, as noted Oct. 10.
Selig is the lone commissioner on what is meant to be a five-member commission, so he can set policy alone, and President Donald Trump has declined to name additional members, per the governance detail. The filings formalize the White House referral without setting a Federal Register date, which leaves both the comment deadline and the interim rule's start day still to be fixed. The actions had been submitted for White House review less than two weeks earlier, with coverage linking a Sept. 30 preview. The three versions ran under the bylines of Jesse Hamilton with Nikhilesh De editing, Guillermo Jimenez, and Liam Wright. The Decrypt version's prose descriptions match both releases, though two of its in-text link targets point to the opposite release numbers.