Loading article...
Learn about Gary Vaynerchuk's (GaryVee) perspective on Web3 and NFTs. This guide covers his investment thesis, his emphasis on community building, and his brand strategy in crypto.
Gary Vaynerchuk's Web3 case is about consumer brands, collectible media, and access. Where some crypto advocates focus on censorship resistance or financial systems, Vaynerchuk treats an NFT as a digital item that can also function as a ticket, membership record, or starting point for a character brand. His VeeFriends project put that view into a concrete product: a set of NFTs linked to conference access and a group of named characters.
That approach is different from a general claim that NFTs create value by themselves. An NFT is a record on a blockchain that can identify a token holder. It may be linked to an image, an event right, a community, or a license. Its usefulness depends on the rights, systems, and people around it. Vaynerchuk's work is useful to study because it makes these dependencies visible.
Vaynerchuk first built his public profile around Wine Library and online video. His official biography says that he and his father renamed the family store Wine Library and launched winelibrary.com in 1996. It says he started WineLibraryTV in 2006 and co-founded VaynerMedia with his brother AJ in 2009. These are claims from Vaynerchuk's own site, rather than independent business reporting.
The same biography says he began angel investing in companies including Facebook, Twitter, Tumblr, Uber, Snap, and Venmo. It also describes VaynerMedia as an advertising agency and says the business later reorganized under VaynerX. VaynerX's own site describes it as a family of companies that includes VaynerMedia, Gallery Media Group, a production company, and other brand and media businesses.
This history helps explain the language Vaynerchuk brought to NFTs. He had spent years arguing that brands should pay attention to new distribution channels and build audiences where attention is moving. In the NFT market of 2021, he applied a similar lens to a digital collectible. His claim was not that every token should be valuable. It was that a recognizable brand could attach ongoing benefits and stories to a token in ways that were easier to verify and transfer than a conventional membership database.
Vaynerchuk's site says VeeFriends launched on May 11, 2021 with 10,255 NFTs and 268 hand-drawn characters. It says that every Series 1 NFT provided admission to VeeCon in 2022, 2023, and 2024. The VeeFriends collection page identifies Series 1, Series 2, Book Games, and later digital-collectible work as separate collections. The exact benefits attached to a token are collection-specific and can change through published terms or event rules.
The original Series 1 design made a useful distinction between the token and the benefit. The token was transferable on the blockchain. Access required a process that recognized the current holder and issued or validated an event ticket. That second step is not supplied by Ethereum alone. It is operated by the event organizer. In other words, blockchain ownership can make eligibility easier to inspect, but an organization still decides how a benefit is delivered.
VeeFriends used characters such as Accountable Ant and Patient Panda as the public face of the collection. The project describes its characters, comics, cards, and physical collectibles on its official site. This is an intellectual-property strategy: use recurring names, visual traits, and stories across formats. The NFT can be one collectible among several, rather than the only product.
It is important not to overstate the ownership consequence. Buying a character NFT does not automatically give the buyer copyright in the drawing or the right to produce merchandise. Rights depend on the collection's license and terms. A buyer should read those documents instead of assuming that a blockchain transaction transfers broad IP rights. Vaynerchuk's use of the word "IP" usually refers to the project building its own character brands, not to every holder owning the franchise.
The clearest part of Vaynerchuk's thesis is utility. A token can serve as evidence that the wallet holder is entitled to something: entry to an event, eligibility to claim an item, access to a digital group, or a particular experience. This is not unique to NFTs. A barcode, account, or database can also gate access. The NFT adds possible transferability and public verification, provided the organizer accepts the token as the credential.
VeeCon provides the clearest real-world example. Vaynerchuk's biography says the first VeeCon ran at US Bank Stadium in Minneapolis from May 19 to 22, 2022. The 2024 VeeCon site lists the Los Angeles event for August 9 to 11, 2024 and describes the event as founded by Vaynerchuk. The 2024 site is promotional material, but dates and location are directly stated by the organizer.
Token-gated ticketing has practical advantages. The same ownership record can be checked without asking a buyer to create a fresh account for every resale. An organizer can set rules about eligibility and can potentially distribute future benefits to current holders. It also has limitations. Wallet access can be lost. A token may be held through a service rather than a self-custody wallet. Transfers can be mistaken or fraudulent. A ticketing system still needs support, fraud controls, accessibility arrangements, refund policies, and a way to handle disputes. The blockchain record does not answer those operational questions.
The ticket model also makes the project dependent on delivery. A token tied to annual events has value partly because the organizer continues to stage events and honor the access terms. If an event ends, the holder still has the token, but not necessarily the same practical benefit. This is a general condition of utility NFTs. The on-chain asset can persist while off-chain promises depend on an active issuer.
Vaynerchuk frequently uses "community" to describe a group that identifies with a project and participates in its events, chat spaces, or culture. In the VeeFriends model, common ownership can give people a reason to meet and recognize one another. That is a social effect, not a technical guarantee.
A token holder can be an enthusiast, a collector, a speculator, or a person who bought access to one event. Ownership alone does not create trust or shared purpose. A project must decide how it moderates conversations, communicates changes, deals with conflict, and treats people who cannot afford the token. These choices determine whether a group functions as a durable community more than the token standard does.
This point is especially relevant after the 2021 NFT market surge. High prices can attract attention quickly, but attention may center on resale rather than participation. Projects that promise benefits face a continuing delivery burden. They also have to communicate carefully. Saying a token will rise in value or provide financial returns can create expectations that the organizer may be unable or unwilling to meet. Vaynerchuk's access-first model is easier to assess when the promised benefit is specific, dated, and documented.
Vaynerchuk has described VeeFriends as an attempt to build long-lived character intellectual property. The project has expanded beyond the original NFTs into physical products, trading cards, and comics. Its collectibles pages list cards, stickers, pins, apparel, and digital collections; its comics page publishes character stories. Those are direct indications of a multi-format brand strategy, not proof that any character will reach the cultural scale of an older franchise.
This distinction matters because the NFT boom produced many projects with familiar-looking profile-picture art and little continuing product work. Vaynerchuk's model says the image should be the start of a brand relationship. That can be tested through ordinary evidence: Are there products, stories, events, licenses, and customers? Are the stated benefits delivered? Does the work make sense for people who do not trade the token?
The strategy has a trade-off. A centrally managed brand can maintain a coherent visual identity and make licensing deals. It is not fully decentralized. The company or rights holder controls characters, distribution, and much of the roadmap. Holders may have membership benefits, but they do not necessarily direct the business. Calling a project "Web3" should not hide that conventional brand management may remain central.
NFT markets are volatile and thin compared with many conventional consumer markets. A listed floor price does not show that every holder can sell at that price. A sale may involve a rare item, a small number of buyers, or temporary incentives. Transaction fees, royalties, marketplace rules, taxes, and currency volatility can affect outcomes. None of these facts says that collecting is irrational. They do mean that an NFT purchase should be understood as a purchase of a particular token and its stated rights, not as a claim on a project's future revenue.
For VeeFriends, a useful reading starts with the collection's exact terms and the event benefit attached to the specific token. The questions are factual. Which chain and wallet are supported? Is the benefit tied to the original holder or current holder? What dates and conditions apply? Who runs the event or community? Is a promised item an organizer obligation, a third-party offer, or merely an aspiration? Can the buyer still use or enjoy the item if there is no resale market?
Those questions reflect Vaynerchuk's central contribution to Web3: he pushed NFT discussions away from an image alone and toward the relationship between a collectible, a brand, and an experience. The relationship can be valuable only when its terms are clear and the organizer continues to perform. The blockchain can record a token transfer. It cannot by itself create a fan base, stage a conference, maintain a character universe, or guarantee a resale price.
Explore more guides and career playbooks